Modern legal systems draw from a rich tapestry of historical traditions. Among these, ancient and medieval legal frameworks continue to shape the meaning and operation of law in the United States. This blog post explores how these enduring influences manifest, with particular attention to Louisiana’s unique legal heritage.
Ancient Foundations: Egypt and Sumeria
The legal systems of ancient Egypt and Sumeria were among the earliest known legal systems. These ancient societies laid foundational principles that resonate in contemporary law. The Sumerians, through codes such as the Code of Ur-Nammu, introduced the concept of codified laws, also establishing clear rules and penalties for various offenses in criminal law. Similarly, ancient Egyptian law emphasized Ma’at, the embodiment of truth, balance and justice, which guided dispute resolution and the administration of justice.
These early systems formalized concepts such as contracts, property rights and equitable treatment, establishing the cornerstones of later legal traditions. By codifying legal principles and ensuring their consistent application, these civilizations set a precedent for the structured and equitable legal systems we recognize today.
Roman and Greek Law in Louisiana
Ancient Roman and Greek legal traditions exert a particularly strong influence in Louisiana, the only U.S. state whose legal system is rooted in the civil law tradition. This tradition, transmitted through French and Spanish colonial law, draws heavily from Roman legal principles and emphasizes codified statutes over judge-made precedent.
Tulane University Law School, located in New Orleans, reflects this heritage through its commitment to comparative legal methodologies and global legal perspectives. Tulane scholars and students engage consciously with ancient legal systems to illuminate the meaning and function of law in the present. The civil law tradition—distinct from the English common law—continues to shape Louisiana’s legal landscape.
Civil Law in Practice: Louisiana Supreme Court
Louisiana’s civil law tradition is evident in its jurisprudence. In State v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., 347 So. 3d 684, the Louisiana Supreme Court drew on Roman Law and the civil law tradition in reaffirming the primacy of statutes and codes over “judge-made” common law jurisprudence. The court emphasized strict interpretation of legislative acts, such as Act 312 governing oilfield remediation, and noted that doctrines like “law of the case,” rooted in common law, are not rigidly applied in Louisiana.
Historical cases also illustrate Roman law’s enduring influence. In Municipality No. 2 v. Orleans Cotton Press, 18 La. 122 (1841), the court examined the Roman principle of alluvion, which grants ownership of land added by a river to the adjacent property owner. This principle, transmitted through French and Spanish law, continues to inform Louisiana property law today.
Another example is the doctrine of contra non valentem, which originated in Roman law and allows exceptions to statutory prescription in exceptional circumstances. This doctrine remains operative in Louisiana, as seen in Hendrick v. ABC Ins. Co., 787 So. 2d 283.
Divergence from Roman Law
Despite these continuities, Louisiana law also diverges from Roman legal principles. For instance, Roman law’s querela inofficiosum testamentum upheld a father’s absolute right to disinherit his children. In contrast, Louisiana law limits this power through the doctrine of forced heirship, which protects underage or permanently incapacitated children from disinheritance. This reflects a broader legal tradition of balancing individual rights with societal norms.
Louisiana’s legal system also blends civil law with common law influences. In Taylor v. Clement, 04-1069 (La. App. 3 Cir. 03/09/05), the court acknowledged that Louisiana judges, while influenced by Anglo-American common law, also draw upon civilian principles, allowing for a more flexible interpretive approach. This hybrid system underscores the interplay between medieval and early common law traditions in Louisiana jurisprudence.
Medieval Law and the Common Law Tradition
Medieval legal traditions also shape modern law in the United States. In State v. Revere, 232 La. 184, the Louisiana Supreme Court traced the origins of the grand jury to the Assize of Clarendon (1166), issued by Henry II. This medieval statute introduced accusatory procedures rooted in Frankish legal customs, establishing the grand jury as a mechanism for public accountability—a concept that persists today.
Similarly, the principle of double jeopardy, addressed in State v. David, 468 So. 2d 1133, has deep roots in medieval English common law. The court noted that protections against multiple prosecutions for the same offense originated in medieval pleas and were later incorporated into colonial American law, demonstrating the enduring influence of medieval legal thought on constitutional protections.
Broader U.S. Context
Louisiana is not alone in drawing on ancient legal traditions. The U.S. Supreme Court has invoked principles from Roman, Greek and Egyptian law, particularly in discussions of “history and tradition.” For example, the attorney-client privilege—recognized as the oldest common law privilege—has roots in the Roman Republic. This tradition underscores the importance of confidentiality and loyalty in legal representation, as affirmed in Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981).
Find Your Place in Law With Tulane Law Online
As you can see, ancient and medieval laws impact modern legal practice today. Interested in learn how to apply legal principles to your own work? Gain legal fluency with Tulane Law School’s online Master of Jurisprudence programs. Choose from pathways in Labor & Employment Law, Environmental Law or Energy Law.
Learn more about our admissions process and schedule a call with our admissions team today to discover how you can master the law that impacts your daily life and work.